The recent vote by the Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) solar buy back rates cut has raised widespread concerns. This decision will have a significant impact on homeowners with rooftop solar installations and the broader solar industry. In this blog post, we will delve into the details of this decision, explore its implications, and discuss why it is crucial to oppose this policy for the future of sustainable energy in Arizona.

Understanding the ACC’s Decision

In August 2023, Arizona Corporation Commissioner, Nick Myers, proposed a significant reduction of net energy metering (NEM) rates by 37% to $0.053 per kWh. If approved, this change would have taken effect abruptly in September. The objective of this proposal was to replace the current legal framework, which allows for an annual 10% reduction in NEM rates. This decision may make solar a less appealing investment in Arizona, potentially hurting the State’s solar industry and increasing energy costs for solar customers.

Impact on Homeowners and Solar Adoption

These solar buy back rates cut are a setback for homeowners who have invested in solar technology. In addition, the reduced compensation for excess solar power undermines the financial viability of solar and devalues the investments made by current and future solar panel owners. It discourages one of the most sustainable and forward-thinking energy choices available to homeowners in Arizona.

Debunking the Cost-Shift Argument

The justification for this solar buy back rates cut is based on the “cost-shift” argument, which suggests that non-solar customers subsidize the infrastructure costs for solar users. However, numerous studies have debunked this argument, showing that any cost shift, if it exists, is minimal. These studies have thoroughly analyzed the financial impact and found that the alleged subsidy is negligible, with the actual costs being distributed fairly among all consumers. The evidence indicates that the “cost-shift” argument does not hold up under scrutiny and should not be used as a basis for rate cuts. {2}.

The Disproportionate Burden on Solar Users

The policy disproportionately burdens solar users by reducing the financial benefits of feeding excess energy back into the grid. Meanwhile, utility companies continue to charge higher rates for energy consumption. This discourages solar adoption and unfairly penalizes those who have chosen a greener path. Subsequently, utility companies, recognizing the inevitable shift towards sustainable energy, have emerged as the foremost adopters of solar technology. Their large-scale solar farms not only underscore a commitment to environmental stewardship but also herald a new era of clean, renewable power sources.

Advocating for Equitable Solar Policy

It is of utmost importance to advocate for policies that not only acknowledge but also fairly compensate homeowners for their invaluable contributions to a more sustainable energy grid. Instead of penalizing solar energy users, it is crucial that we incentivize and reward them for their environmentally friendly choices, which play a significant role in combating climate change and facilitating our transition to renewable energy sources, as well as keeping the cost of energy low for all users of the grid. The recent ACC decision is a setback in our fight against climate change and efforts to adopt renewable energy solutions. Furthermore, let’s prioritize fair compensation and policies that empower homeowners in their pursuit of a greener future and sustainable grid.

Moving Forward

To address these regressive policies, the solar industry, environmental advocates, and homeowners must join forces. We need to advocate for transparent and equitable compensation models that accurately reflect the value of solar energy. This includes considering the environmental benefits, reducing the need for costly infrastructure, and ensuring a sustainable energy future.


The decision made by the ACC regarding solar buy back rates goes beyond a simple policy change. It sends a clear message to homeowners and the solar industry in Arizona that sustainable energy choices are undervalued. It is crucial to raise our voices, demand fair compensation, and support policies that acknowledge the worth of renewable energy. Together, we can advocate for a brighter and more sustainable future for Arizona and beyond.

Spread the Power, Share Now